| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres not willing to use an index? |
| Date: | 2009-02-06 16:14:32 |
| Message-ID: | 8902.1233936872@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr> writes:
> Besides PK and uq-constraint indices I have this index:
> CREATE INDEX transactions_idx__client_data ON transactions
> USING btree (transaction_client_id, transaction_destination_id,
> transaction_operator_id, transaction_application_id,
> transaction_time_commit)
> SELECT <some-columns> FROM transactions WHERE transaction_time_commit
> BETWEEN '2009-01-01' AND '2009-01-31 23:59:59';
> The problem is that postgres is never using an index:
Hardly surprising --- a search on the index's lowest-order column would
require scanning practically all of the index. (If you think about the
ordering of the index entries you'll see why.) If this is a typical
query then you need a separate index on transaction_time_commit.
The fine manual goes into some detail about how to design indexes;
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/indexes.html
particularly 11.3, 11.5.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-02-06 16:29:58 | Re: Postgres not willing to use an index? |
| Previous Message | justin | 2009-02-06 16:05:42 | Re: suggestions for postgresql setup on Dell 2950 , PERC6i controller |