Re: Postgres not willing to use an index?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres not willing to use an index?
Date: 2009-02-06 16:14:32
Message-ID: 8902.1233936872@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Mario Splivalo <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr> writes:
> Besides PK and uq-constraint indices I have this index:

> CREATE INDEX transactions_idx__client_data ON transactions
> USING btree (transaction_client_id, transaction_destination_id,
> transaction_operator_id, transaction_application_id,
> transaction_time_commit)

> SELECT <some-columns> FROM transactions WHERE transaction_time_commit
> BETWEEN '2009-01-01' AND '2009-01-31 23:59:59';
> The problem is that postgres is never using an index:

Hardly surprising --- a search on the index's lowest-order column would
require scanning practically all of the index. (If you think about the
ordering of the index entries you'll see why.) If this is a typical
query then you need a separate index on transaction_time_commit.

The fine manual goes into some detail about how to design indexes;
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/indexes.html
particularly 11.3, 11.5.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-02-06 16:29:58 Re: Postgres not willing to use an index?
Previous Message justin 2009-02-06 16:05:42 Re: suggestions for postgresql setup on Dell 2950 , PERC6i controller