| From: | "Alexander Staubo" <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | hanasaki <hanasaki(at)hanaden(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: clustering failover... ala Oracle Parallel server |
| Date: | 2007-08-07 16:37:11 |
| Message-ID: | 88daf38c0708070937u4596f816xb267cad53ec4d95d@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/4/07, hanasaki <hanasaki(at)hanaden(dot)com> wrote:
> clustering failover... ala Oracle Parallel server
Note that OPS is now called RAC (see http://orafaq.com/faq/what_is_rac_ops)
> How can the server be setup in a cluster for load-balancing and failover
> like perhaps OPS?
As I understand it, RAC implements a kind of multi-master replication
by sharing database files across multiple machines in conjunction with
a distributed lock manager.
I believe the closest you get to this scheme with PostgreSQL is
PGCluster-II (see
http://www.pgcon.org/2007/schedule/events/6.en.html) which implements
a shared-disk replicaton system. However, I believe the project is
still under development.
There are other ways to implement load-balancing and failover, using
tools such as Slony, pgpool and Skype's londiste. There have been a
dozen threads this year on this topic; I suggest you scan the mailing
list archives.
> How does the Postges solution compare to an Oracle? MSSQL? MySQL solution?
Does MySQL have anything resembling RAC?
Alexander.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2007-08-07 17:30:58 | Re: finding reusable ids |
| Previous Message | mr19 | 2007-08-07 16:23:23 | UPDATES hang every 5 minutes |