Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases?

From: "Alexander Staubo" <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net>
To: "Ron Johnson" <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases?
Date: 2007-06-16 23:20:48
Message-ID: 88daf38c0706161620m1c084a13i6b3919b7e4333f0d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 6/17/07, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> wrote:
> On 06/16/07 17:05, Alexander Staubo wrote:
> > On 6/16/07, Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> wrote:
> >> > Hardware acceleration for quickly counting the number of
> >> > set/unset/matching bits?
> >>
> >> x86 doesn't already do that?
> >
> > I don't think so. The fastest way, I believe, is to use precomputed
> > lookup tables. Same for finding the least/most significant set/unset
> > bit, and other operations useful for dealing with bit vectors.
>
> A couple of new AMD Barcelona opcodes might help do that:
>
> http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=2939&p=6

Very cool. Thanks for the pointer.

Alexander.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Leif B. Kristensen 2007-06-16 23:51:07 Re: PHP sucks!! - was: persistent db connections in PHP
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2007-06-16 22:26:46 Re: What O/S or hardware feature would be useful for databases?