Re: BUG #15706: Support Services page out of date

On 4/27/19 6:41 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 5:48 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <mailto:jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>> wrote:

> This is also a long way of saying that I think we should proceed with
> the solution to help automate this. After going through the painstaking
> process again, I'd recommend it works kind of like this:
>
> - An email goes out once every {6 months, 1 year} to the organizational
> contact that says something like: "Hi, This is an automated check to
> ensure your company is still an active PostgreSQL service provider.
> Please click the URL provided to confirm. <UniqueURL> If you do not
> confirm within 7 days, your listing will be unpublished"
>
>
> 7 days might be a bit on the short side. If someone is unlucky they get
> the notification while on vacation for example, and then they're
> delisted before they can even see it.

Well, that's why I suggested it gets de-listed, so one of us can
manually check and determine if indeed it should be delisted, or it's
the case of out-of-office, or a bad email address, etc.

> - If user clicks URL, it is confirmed and the last_confirmed_date is set
> to CURRENT_DATE
>
> - If user does not click URL, we set the entry to unpublished. This
> would put it into the moderator feed, and one of the pgweb moderators
> can then take further action if need be.
>
>
> That's pretty close to my original thoughts around that, except I'd just
> delete them as step 3 and not bother the queue.  I'm fine with
> de-listing it as well, as long as pgweb moderators are happy to handle
> that :) That would also take care of the scenario where the email
> bounces, by simply being able to ignore that fact and leave it up to the
> individual moderator to handle manually.

I would de-list it. It's certainly easier for a moderator to check a few
of said entries vs. the whole slew.

> Anyway, products needs a scrub as well, which I will try to block out
> some time for in the coming days to handle those as well. Those should
> hopefully not take as much time as they are a bit easier to verify.
>
> Cool. Thanks!

NP, feels good to do some spring/fall cleaning :)

Jonathan