| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
| Date: | 2004-11-08 18:05:03 |
| Message-ID: | 8894.1099937103@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/4/2004 5:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> autovacuum would probably be a reasonable place to put it. We don't
>> currently have any good way for autovacuum to get at the information,
>> but I suppose that an integrated autovacuum daemon could do so.
> Don't know why this must be an "integrated" autovacuum. Can't the info
> about the FSM usage be presented as system views?
No doubt, but that's not free either --- it'd still need supporting
code in the backend.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2004-11-08 18:06:47 | Re: View pg_stat_activity slow to get up to date |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-11-08 17:56:57 | Re: View pg_stat_activity slow to get up to date |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2004-11-09 00:00:18 | Re: figuring out what I can do |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-11-08 16:40:25 | Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |