Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug
Date: 2000-01-12 05:42:30
Message-ID: 8888.947655750@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> We recommended the : in the first place because it is the standard for
>> embedded SQL variable handling.

> So the array syntax should be changed?

Bzzt, wrong answer.

I'm open to alternative answers on this, but breaking existing
application scripts is not one of the acceptable alternatives.

*Especially* not if there's no obvious failure report, as there
will not be if we don't change psql's behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-01-12 05:53:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-01-12 03:30:43 Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin"