From: | greg(at)turnstep(dot)com |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Website questions/conserns |
Date: | 2003-07-22 19:10:15 |
Message-ID: | 88652ce8e879f138a5fa3f3c9078f596@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Actually, we do have secondary DNS servers setup already ... but if the
> main zone file gets hosed and the secondary pulls down that hosed file, it
> doesn't do any good now, does it? :) No amount of redundancy in DNS can
> compensate for that ...
The idea of a secondary DNS server is that if the main server goes down
(or the whole subnet), people can still reach the rest of the *.postgresql.org
domains (especially the mirrors). It also looks as though there are still
no secondary DNS servers set up for postgresql.org, where "secondary" means a
server not in the same subnet or geographical area. It would be nice to
see another server set up; myself and others have an outstanding offer
to help do this.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200307221504
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
iD8DBQE/HYuavJuQZxSWSsgRAv18AKCk23L+iBspIuDwIwQFtQWEQ/ap2ACgzHOS
I9hZRZS24VkD5Q/Q27DpFSg=
=HF2p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-07-22 19:14:18 | Re: Website questions/conserns |
Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-07-22 18:57:16 | Re: New Poll @ Codewalkers |