From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces |
Date: | 2004-03-03 05:36:38 |
Message-ID: | 8850.1078292198@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
>> symlinks.
> Agreed, but are we going to support non-tablespace installs? I wasn't
> sure that was an option.
A setup containing only the default tablespace cannot use any symlinks.
That doesn't seem hard though.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-03-03 08:14:31 | Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-03 05:33:51 | Re: Out of space situation and WAL log pre-allocation (was Tablespaces) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-03-03 10:00:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-03-03 05:25:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces |