Re: Detection of IPC::Run presence in SSL TAP tests

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Detection of IPC::Run presence in SSL TAP tests
Date: 2017-06-15 20:46:41
Message-ID: 8844.1497559601@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 6/15/17 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Pushed, thanks. I grabbed the very latest copy of ax_prog_perl_modules
>> out of the GNU archives --- it's only cosmetically different, but we
>> might as well be au courant.

> Um, this patch was previously rejected. Shouldn't we at least discuss
> it, or have it go through the commit fest? This is not a regression
> against 9.6.

It was rejected only because we didn't want to move the goalposts for
the then-active CMake effort. That argument no longer applies, I'd say.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-06-15 21:04:17 Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2017-06-15 20:29:42 Re: WIP: Data at rest encryption