Re: Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ?

From: Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com>
To: pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ?
Date: 2003-12-29 20:06:47
Message-ID: 883C780B-3A3A-11D8-B3E1-000393A47FCC@ravensfield.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc


Sounds like a capital idea...

There may be some of the more obscure platforms out there that still
need 1.2, but if someone's still limited to 1.1 they probably
should switch to perl or python...or just be content with an older
driver.

On Dec 29, 2003, at 2:25 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:

> As we are going to be moving to gborg, it is an opportunity to do some
> reorganization, one way of simplifying the driver is to drop support
> for
> some old jvm's.
>
> Is this a problem for anyone?
>
> --
> Dave Cramer
> 519 939 0336
> ICQ # 1467551
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
--------------------

Andrew Rawnsley
President
The Ravensfield Digital Resource Group, Ltd.
(740) 587-0114
www.ravensfield.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2003-12-29 20:07:53 Re: getBinaryStream/setBinaryStream 7.2<->7.4 Question
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2003-12-29 19:25:38 Drop support for jdk 1.1, 1.2 ?