From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "David F(dot) Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T option |
Date: | 2004-07-21 15:09:17 |
Message-ID: | 8839.1090422557@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"David F. Skoll" <dfs(at)roaringpenguin(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> pg_dump -t s1.t1 -t s2.t2 -- Dump s1.t1 and s2.t2
> That's a good idea, but then it's questionable whether we need the -n
> switch at all.
Sure we do --- for backwards compatibility if nothing else.
> It might be simpler to extend the -t switch to accept:
> pg-dump -t 's1.*'
That would not be the same thing --- that would mean to dump *only tables*
from s1, rather than objects of all types. Anyway, I think it's a bit
late in this cycle to be proposing to implement wild-card matching.
Maybe for next time someone can do that, but for 7.5 I think we should
limit ourselves to cleaning up any design flaws of the already-submitted
patch.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ares Consulting Services | 2004-07-21 15:12:18 | Postgres jobs Toronto |
Previous Message | David F. Skoll | 2004-07-21 14:59:28 | Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-07-21 16:51:50 | Re: Show tablespace name in pg_tables and pg_indexes |
Previous Message | David F. Skoll | 2004-07-21 14:59:28 | Re: Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and new -T |