Re: [PATCHES] Implemented current_query

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Uh, I think based on other usage it should be called client_statement().

That is *exactly* the wrong thing, because "statement" specifically
means one SQL statement.

"client_query" seems about the best compromise I've heard so far.

It's too bad we didn't have this debate before pg_stat_activity got out
into the wild, because it's now too late to rename its column
current_query. Possibly we should stick with current_query() just
for consistency with that view ...

regards, tom lane