From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Crash with a CUBE query on 9.6 |
Date: | 2016-12-19 20:49:10 |
Message-ID: | 8821dc7b-50e0-b983-1590-344108b20855@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 12/19/2016 09:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> writes:
>> The attached test case crashes on REL9_6_STABLE and master. On 9.5, it
>> worked.
>
> As best I can tell, this is the fault of commit 804163bc2.
Oh, the ball is right back in my court, then.
> The problem query can be simplified to
>
> SELECT
> STDDEV(DISTINCT floor(sale.cn)),
> AVG(DISTINCT floor(sale.cn))
> FROM sale,vendor
> WHERE sale.vn=vendor.vn
> GROUP BY CUBE((sale.cn,sale.dt,sale.dt),(sale.pn,sale.prc),(sale.qty,sale.vn)),sale.qty order by 1,2 ;
And further:
SELECT
STDDEV(DISTINCT g::float8),
AVG(DISTINCT g::float8)
FROM generate_series(1, 1000) g;
> The two aggregates share a "pertrans" state, but finalize_aggregates
> does not account for that and calls process_ordered_aggregate_single()
> twice on the same pertrans state. The second time crashes because we
> already deleted the tuplesort object the first time.
>
> Probably, the loop in finalize_aggregates needs to be split into two,
> one over the pertrans states and then a second one over the peragg states.
> But this code has been hacked up enough since I last looked at it that
> I'm hesitant to try to fix it myself.
Yes, that seems straightforward. I came up with the attached. Will
commit tomorrow, barring objections.
Thanks for the debugging!
- Heikki
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Fix-sharing-Agg-transition-state-of-DISTINCT-or-orde.patch | invalid/octet-stream | 3.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-19 21:22:24 | Re: Crash with a CUBE query on 9.6 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-12-19 19:37:20 | Re: Crash with a CUBE query on 9.6 |