From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] posmaster failed under high load |
Date: | 1999-05-06 14:20:06 |
Message-ID: | 8811.926000406@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> The only way to get around this is to do an execv(), at which point the
>> kernel will recopy argv[0].
> We used to do execv(), but stopped doing it for performance reasons.
It's clearly not worth re-introducing the exec call just to make ps
status display work (especially since it's only failing when the backend
is swapped out). However, I wonder whether there is another answer.
Something that's been on my to-do list since the ps-status-display code
got added is to import "sendmail"'s ps-status-display module lock, stock,
and barrel. Sendmail's code is kinda ugly, but it's been wrung out and
works on a wide variety of Unixes. The code we have doesn't ... (it's
never worked on my HPUX box, for instance, whereas sendmail does).
I have no idea at the moment whether sendmail knows how to change the
task_struct on Linux; but it might.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlos Peralta Ramirez | 1999-05-06 14:24:01 | the today question !!! |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-05-06 14:04:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: INSERT/UPDATE waiting (another example) |