| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Do CustomScan as not projection capable node |
| Date: | 2019-04-19 04:45:04 |
| Message-ID: | 8810.1555649104@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> Can we include the CustomScan node in the list of nodes that do not
> support projection?
That seems like a pretty bad idea. Maybe it's a good thing for whatever
unspecified extension you have in mind right now, but it's likely to be
a net negative for many more. As an example, if some custom extension has
a better way to calculate some output expression than the core code does,
a restriction like this would prevent that from being implemented.
> Reason is that custom node can contain quite arbitrary logic that does
> not guarantee projection support.
I don't buy this for a minute. Where do you think projection is
going to happen? There isn't any existing node type that *couldn't*
support projection if we insisted that that be done across-the-board.
I think it's mostly just a legacy thing that some don't.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2019-04-19 05:39:26 | Re: bug in update tuple routing with foreign partitions |
| Previous Message | Asim R P | 2019-04-19 04:38:04 | Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion) |