Re: Assertion failure with a subtransaction and cursor

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assertion failure with a subtransaction and cursor
Date: 2009-12-03 15:21:05
Message-ID: 8804.1259853665@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Ok, committed that way. I made the cross-check a WARNING. That seems
> like the right level of seriousness, although I see that many of the
> other similar checks are Asserts.

Looks good. I'm a bit tempted to rename the interXact argument to
something like noOwner --- no change in API, just name it a bit closer
to what it actually does now. Thoughts?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hamilton 2009-12-03 15:56:05 BUG #5231: SELECT DISTINCT poorly implemented vs SELECT ... GROUP BY
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-12-03 15:08:35 Re: BUG #5230: Limit operator slows down