| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: list of acknowledgments for PG15 |
| Date: | 2022-10-10 18:44:22 |
| Message-ID: | 88019.1665427462@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 02:41:06AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> As far as I've understood, the idea is to credit people based on the
>> time frame in which their patches were committed, not on the branch(es)
>> that the patches were committed to.
> Is the issue that we are really only crediting people whose commits/work
> appears in major releases, and not in minor ones?
What Peter has said about this is that he lists everyone whose name
has appeared in commit messages over thus-and-such a time frame.
So it doesn't matter which branch is involved, just when the contribution
was made. That process is fine with me; I'm just seeking a bit more
clarity as to what the time frames are.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2022-10-10 18:48:36 | Re: list of acknowledgments for PG15 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2022-10-10 18:30:35 | Re: list of acknowledgments for PG15 |