| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, <andrew(at)supernews(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |
| Date: | 2007-03-28 19:15:20 |
| Message-ID: | 87zm5xrxh3.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> CREATE ARRAY TYPE FOR foo
I also made a suggestion along the way that we never create array types
automatically except for domains. Ie, we don't need a new command, we just
document that what you do if you want to create an array of something is
create a domain for it then use arrays of that domain.
I'm not sure whether having to create a new command is cleaner or less clean
than overloading an existing command with two purposes.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-28 19:24:26 | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |
| Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-03-28 19:13:21 | Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-28 19:24:26 | Re: Arrays of Complex Types |
| Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2007-03-28 19:00:22 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |