From: | Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Calculating memory allocaiton per process |
Date: | 2011-04-14 19:00:07 |
Message-ID: | 87zknsek08.fsf@comcast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> writes:
> Howdy,
>
> Is there a doc somewhere that has a formula for how much memory PG
> backend process will use?
>
> I'm looking to get something like total_mem = max_connections * (
> work_mem + temp_buffers ) // I know it's more complicated than that,
> which is why I'm asking =)
Depends on your query complexity, load distribution across concurrent
sessions and session lifetime.
work_mem will, in cases of queries having multiple sort nodes, have to
be counted multiple times on behalf of a single backend.
Some observation of the running system can be your best bet.
HTH
> Something similar to Table 17-2 here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/kernel-resources.html
> would be awesome.
>
> Dave
--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net
p: 305.321.1144
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-04-14 19:14:11 | Re: SSDs with Postgresql? |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2011-04-14 18:54:29 | Re: SSDs with Postgresql? |