Re: Readd use of TAP subtests

From: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Readd use of TAP subtests
Date: 2021-12-08 13:49:06
Message-ID: 87zgpbnr59.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

> Now that subtests in TAP are supported again, I want to correct the
> great historical injustice of 7912f9b7dc9e2d3f6cd81892ef6aa797578e9f06
> and put those subtests back.

The updated Test::More version requirement also gives us done_testing()
(added in 0.88), which saves us from the constant maintenance headache
of updating the test counts every time. Do you fancy switching the
tests you're modifying anyway to that?

- ilmari

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-12-08 13:53:33 Re: Readd use of TAP subtests
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-12-08 13:26:35 Readd use of TAP subtests