From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Optimize ORDER BY ... LIMIT |
Date: | 2006-09-15 22:04:59 |
Message-ID: | 87y7skokfo.fsf@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I don't know if this is the same thing you are talking about, but Oleg
> talked to me on the conference about "partial sort", which AFAICS it's
> about the same thing you are talking about. I think Teodor submitted a
> patch to implement it, which was rejected because of not being general
> enough.
Oof, you have a long memory. Oleg does reference such a thing in his 2002 post
that ended up resulting in the TODO item. I can't find the original patch but
I doubt any patch against 7.1 is going to be all that helpful in understanding
what to do today.
I'm also confused how he only saw a factor of 6 improvement in reading the top
100 out of a million. I would expect much better.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-15 22:13:25 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Sequences were not being shown due to |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-15 21:55:08 | Re: [HACKERS] Simplifying "standby mode" |