| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit? |
| Date: | 2007-12-08 06:48:37 |
| Message-ID: | 87y7c5of5m.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>> I've just noticed that pg_controldata doesn't say anything about whether
>>> the database is 64-bit or 32-bit.
>>
>> That's because there is no such concept.
>
> I think the relevant concept is whether Datum is 32-bit or 64-bit wide.
Oh, I see what you meant now. Datum is a purely in-memory concept, it doesn't
actually reach disk.
We could always tighten this up a bit by listing the alignment of a handful of
built-in data types but I suppose there will always be holes in this area
anyways.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's 24x7 Postgres support!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-12-08 07:01:02 | Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit? |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-12-08 05:45:53 | Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit? |