Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GiST: PickSplit and multi-attr indexes
Date: 2004-11-16 20:58:01
Message-ID: 87wtwl7bqe.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> If there are no don't-care cases, then you're effectively saying that
> the first column's PickSplit has sole control over the tree shape,
> which is where we're at now. ISTM the entire point of a multi-column
> index is that the first column has duplicates, or at least values that
> are similar enough to qualify as don't-cares.

I'm not sure that GiST indexes behave the same way as btree indexes for the
multi-column case.

In a btree index the second column is entirely subordinate to the first
column. In a GiST index the data is multi-dimensional, and all dimensions are
equally important.

For a concrete example, say you wanted to index a 2d cartesian coordinate. If
you stored it in a single column using the point data type (or a 2 element
array) then the PickSplit function can use both coordinates to determine its
split. A GiST index on two separate integer columns really shouldn't be
prevented from operating in the same way.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-11-16 21:02:08 Re: Minor problem with Makefile.shlib
Previous Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-11-16 20:28:41 Minor problem with Makefile.shlib