From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A question about Vacuum analyze |
Date: | 2006-02-18 02:42:53 |
Message-ID: | 87wtfttmj6.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Quoth emilu(at)encs(dot)concordia(dot)ca (Emi Lu):
>> no. the suggestion was that a VACUUM is not needed, but that an
>> ANALYZE might be.
>
> Thank you gnari for your answer. But I am a bit confused about not
> running vacuum but only "analyze". Can I seperate these two
> operations? I guess "vacuum analyze" do both vacuum and analyze. Or
> "EXPLAIN ANALYZE" can do it for me?
EXPLAIN, ANALYZE, and VACUUM are different things; ANALYZE gets used
in two different contexts...
1. VACUUM is what cleans dead tuples out of tables.
e.g. VACUUM my_table;
2. VACUUM ANALYZE cleans out dead tuples and recalculates data
distributions
e.g. VACUUM ANALYZE my_table;
3. EXPLAIN describes query plans
e.g. EXPLAIN select * from my_table;
4. EXPLAIN ANALYZE compares query plan estimates to real results
e.g. EXPLAIN ANALYZE select * from my_table;
5. ANALYZE recalculates data distributions (as in 2, but without
cleaning out dead tuples).
e.g. ANALYZE my_table;
Pointedly, EXPLAIN ANALYZE is entirely distinct from ANALYZE and
VACUUM ANALYZE...
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="cbbrowne.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/slony.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #218. "I will not pick up a glowing ancient
artifact and shout "Its power is now mine!!!" Instead I will grab some
tongs, transfer it to a hazardous materials container, and transport
it back to my lab for study." <http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2006-02-18 02:44:50 | Re: EnterpriseDB |
Previous Message | Ragnar | 2006-02-17 23:08:42 | Re: Converting an ASCII database to an UTF-8 database |