Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful
Date: 2006-07-11 20:04:10
Message-ID: 87wtajnc1x.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:

> Let's add the author and the hackers list to the reply-to.

I think reply-to is just a single address. It may work in some mailers though.

Regardless the issue is that someone may send a personal message and be
surprised when it's broadcast. You can always resent a message accidentally
sent personally but you can't unsend one that should not have seen wider
distribution.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-07-11 20:14:03 Implied Functional Index use
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2006-07-11 19:59:30 Re: GIN index creation extremely slow ?