From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-patches considered harmful |
Date: | 2006-07-11 20:04:10 |
Message-ID: | 87wtajnc1x.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Let's add the author and the hackers list to the reply-to.
I think reply-to is just a single address. It may work in some mailers though.
Regardless the issue is that someone may send a personal message and be
surprised when it's broadcast. You can always resent a message accidentally
sent personally but you can't unsend one that should not have seen wider
distribution.
--
greg
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-07-11 20:14:03 | Implied Functional Index use |
Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2006-07-11 19:59:30 | Re: GIN index creation extremely slow ? |