| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CommitFest 2009-11: Two weeks (and a little) update |
| Date: | 2009-12-02 08:21:53 |
| Message-ID: | 87ws15sse2.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-rrreviewers |
>>>>> "Greg" == Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
Greg> Another problem right now are patches where a review was done, the
Greg> patch updated, and now a re-review is needed. I've been trying to not
Greg> give anyone a hard time over these, as in many cases the initial
Greg> review was done quite quickly, but they're starting to pile up now:
Greg> add more frame types in window functions (ROWS) Andrew Gierth
I was hoping that there would have been some feedback on the issue
that Hitoshi raised on -hackers some days ago, since it seems to be
the only outstanding issue with this patch now. Since this is a
question about stability of an API which is potentially in use by
third-party modules (I don't think we have any easy way to know if
it's _actually_ in use), I'm not happy with making an accept/reject
decision based on it without feedback from others.
I have now posted to -hackers in an attempt to prompt some response.
--
Andrew.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-12-02 10:02:18 | Re: CommitFest 2009-11: Two weeks (and a little) update |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2009-12-02 07:33:39 | CommitFest 2009-11: Two weeks (and a little) update |