From: | Adrian Phillips <adrianp(at)powertech(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Great Bridge benchmark results for Postgres, 4 others |
Date: | 2000-08-15 13:49:27 |
Message-ID: | 87vgx2k520.fsf@grannyogg.localnet |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "Ned" == Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com> writes:
<snip>
Ned> The other databases tested against the AS3AP benchmarks, open
Ned> source competitors MySQL 3.22 and Interbase 6.0, demonstrated
Ned> some speed with a low number of users but a distinct lack of
Ned> scalability. MySQL reached a peak of 803.48 with two users,
Ned> but its performance fell precipitously under the stress of
Ned> additional users to a rate of 117.87 transactions per second
Ned> with 100 users. Similarly, Interbase reached 424 transactions
Ned> per second with four users, but its performance declined
Ned> steadily with additional users, dropping off to 146.86
Ned> transactions per second with 100 users.
It would have been more interesting if MySQL 3.23 had been tested as
this has reached what seems to be a fairly stable beta and seems to
perform some operations significantly faster than 3.22 and I believe
may scale somewhat better as well. Of course it may not be so
interesting for most PostgreSQL users :-)
Sincerely,
Adrian Phillips
--
Your mouse has moved.
Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect.
Reboot now? [OK]
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Branden R. Williams | 2000-08-15 14:20:50 | ERROR: unexpected SELECT query in exec_stmt_execsql() |
Previous Message | Paulo Henrique Baptista de Oliveira | 2000-08-15 13:37:27 | Re: List of Large sites using Postgres |