Re: count(*), EXISTS, indexes

From: Itai Zukerman <zukerman(at)math-hat(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: count(*), EXISTS, indexes
Date: 2003-04-11 21:22:33
Message-ID: 87vfxkrap2.fsf@matt.w80.math-hat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

>> Define:
>> CREATE TABLE A (x int PRIMARY KEY, real v);
>> CREATE TABLE B (x int);
>
>> I'd like to calculate:
>> SELECT sum(v) FROM A WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM B WHERE A.x=B.x);
>> ...but then it won't use the primary key index on A.x.
>
> In CVS tip (7.4-to-be) I think
>
> SELECT sum(v) FROM A WHERE A.x IN (SELECT B.x FROM B);

Oops. I guess I should've changed the example to "WHERE A.x>=B.x"
since that's what I'm really doing. Oh, well, my goof.

> would probably work well. In current releases I think all you can do is
> add an index to B.x and settle for the EXISTS() approach.

I don't think indexing B will help speed-wise if it still does the seq
scan through A.

>> PS. B is relatively small, a few thousand rows, while A has well over
>> 500,000 rows. The DISTINCT A.x should be about 10,000-50,000.
>
> BTW, how can a PRIMARY KEY column have fewer DISTINCT values than there
> are rows?

Oh, I just meant, "the DISTINCT A.x that are returned by:

SELECT DISTINCT A.x FROM A,B WHERE A.x=B.x

". Sorry for my lack of clarity...

--
Itai Zukerman <http://www.math-hat.com/~zukerman/>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itai Zukerman 2003-04-11 21:32:00 Re: count(*), EXISTS, indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-11 21:10:52 Re: count(*), EXISTS, indexes