| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Problems with pgsql mail servers? |
| Date: | 2004-06-01 16:30:15 |
| Message-ID: | 87vfib6y20.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Bret Busby <bret(at)busby(dot)net> writes:
> For some strange reason, the message above, took somewhat over
> three months to come through, maybe due to the To address in the header
> (?).
I also just received a message from a pgsql mailing list dated Feb 12. The
delay seemed to be in the queue on ns.pcbuddy.net [66.132.188.173]. And
someone commented a few months ago that I was unknowingly responding to a
long-dead thread, presumably due to a similar occurrence.
Is it possible these mail servers aren't running their queues regularly? If a
network failure causes a delivery failure on the first attempt messages will
sit in a queue until they're retried. If qmail isn't configured to run its
queue regularly then they'll languish there.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Parker | 2004-06-01 16:45:08 | Re: Error running initdb |
| Previous Message | Jim Seymour | 2004-06-01 15:56:46 | Re: Error running initdb |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Duane Lee - EGOVX | 2004-06-01 16:53:56 | Re: multiple count functions in a select statement |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-06-01 16:22:14 | Re: Large table search question |