Re: ARC patent

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Date: 2005-01-22 01:13:50
Message-ID: 87vf9q6zap.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:

> John Hansen wrote:
>
> >Folks,
> >
> >Asking this again as it seems my question got lost, or at least unanswered.
> >
> >Why not just contact IBM, and get their opinion?
> >
> 1. We don't have attorneys to do so.
> 2. The PostgreSQL community is not a legal entity it can license to.
> 3. It would take weeks if not months to get an answer
> 4. The patent isn't issed yet.

Don't forget:

5. They would also have to license everyone else who might want to repackage
or use Postgres. Such as Fujitsu, a big competitor of theirs.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J Roy 2005-01-22 01:43:06 how to set password while loging into database
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-01-21 23:58:05 Re: ARC patent