Re: Not-so-open items

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not-so-open items
Date: 2006-09-14 10:36:42
Message-ID: 87venqspj9.fsf@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> I changed the locking thing I was worried about. Unless Greg wants to
> do some real-world performance measurements to confirm or refute that
> change, I think this can be closed.

I could do some if you're curious but my feeling is that the conservative
choice is the right choice here regardless of what those numbers would show.
So yeah, it should be closed.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dhanaraj M 2006-09-14 10:41:06 Is there any utility to update the table whenever text file gets changed?
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2006-09-14 09:45:23 Re: AIX shared libraries