From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Controlling hot standby |
Date: | 2009-01-23 15:13:46 |
Message-ID: | 87vds6kqc5.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> Is 'hot standby' going to be the official moniker for the feature?
>> (not 'standby replication', or something else?). I wonder if we
>> should pick something more descriptive.
>
> Could also be something like "allow_connections_during_recovery".
>
> I'd keep the word "replication" out of this..
Just wondering, but does this make more sense as a recovery.conf parameter?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-23 15:14:04 | Re: AIX 4.3 getaddrinfo busted |
Previous Message | Andrew Chernow | 2009-01-23 15:12:38 | Re: AIX 4.3 getaddrinfo busted |