Re: recovery_connections cannot start

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recovery_connections cannot start
Date: 2010-04-27 13:10:44
Message-ID: 87vdbd6nxn.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Treating the string "true" as a special case seems like a kludge to
> me. Maybe a robust set of internal commands wouldn't be a kludge, but
> that's not what's being proposed here. I guess it's just a matter of
> opinion.

I don't see how to have internal commands without having special cases
for the setting, and I did propose "pg_archive_bypass" as the name. I
guess the implementation would be what Simon was talking about, though.

I don't see "true" as meaningful in the context of an archive_command…

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-27 13:20:53 Re: recovery_connections cannot start
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-27 12:58:49 Re: Wierd quirk of HS/SR, probably not fixable