From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: recovery_connections cannot start |
Date: | 2010-04-27 13:10:44 |
Message-ID: | 87vdbd6nxn.fsf@hi-media-techno.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Treating the string "true" as a special case seems like a kludge to
> me. Maybe a robust set of internal commands wouldn't be a kludge, but
> that's not what's being proposed here. I guess it's just a matter of
> opinion.
I don't see how to have internal commands without having special cases
for the setting, and I did propose "pg_archive_bypass" as the name. I
guess the implementation would be what Simon was talking about, though.
I don't see "true" as meaningful in the context of an archive_command…
Regards,
--
dim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-27 13:20:53 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-27 12:58:49 | Re: Wierd quirk of HS/SR, probably not fixable |