Re: Performance problem in PLPgSQL

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: dlight <avinfo79(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance problem in PLPgSQL
Date: 2013-09-18 15:47:16
Message-ID: 87vc1yxhij.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "dlight" == dlight <avinfo79(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

dlight> So if I run function 10000 with varible inside the query in
dlight> one session it's replan each time.

dlight> But if whant to teling postgres do not doing this, what shoud
dlight> i do?

dlight> We have more than 10000 runs in one session with varible
dlight> inside sql. And have big performance problem in 9.2 and 9.3.

dlight> Here is my tests.
dlight> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/function-execute-on-v-9-2-slow-down-tp5767170p5771403.html

One interesting question is: why on earth is that query taking ~500ms
just to plan?

(Second question is, what are the plans and costs for the generic and
custom plans being generated, but that's harder to determine)

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-09-18 15:50:23 Re: record identical operator
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-09-18 15:43:31 Re: relscan_details.h