Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table
Date: 2017-06-18 23:06:15
Message-ID: 87vansq4ml.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:

Thomas> Thanks both for the review. New version of patch #2 attached.

I'm looking to commit this soon; if anyone has any further comment now
would be a good time to speak up.

--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2017-06-18 23:08:22 Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2017-06-18 23:04:04 Re: Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT