From: | Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Arseny Sher <a(dot)sher(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix slot's xmin advancement and subxact's lost snapshots in decoding. |
Date: | 2018-06-21 08:31:17 |
Message-ID: | 87vaacpmlm.fsf@ars-thinkpad |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
Thank you for your time.
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2018-Jun-11, Antonin Houska wrote:
>
>>
>> One comment about the coding: since you introduce a new transaction list and
>> it's sorted by LSN, I think you should make the function AssertTXNLsnOrder()
>> more generic and use it to check the by_base_snapshot_lsn list too. For
>> example call it after the list insertion and deletion in
>> ReorderBufferPassBaseSnapshot().
Ok, probably this makes sense. Updated patch is attached.
>> Also I think it makes no harm if you split the diff into two, although both
>> fixes use the by_base_snapshot_lsn field.
>
> Please don't.
Yeah, I don't think we should bother with that.
--
Arseny Sher
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Fix-slot-s-xmin-advancement-and-subxact-s-lost-snaps.patch | text/x-diff | 26.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-06-21 09:13:42 | Making "COPY partitioned_table FROM" faster |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2018-06-21 08:00:34 | Re: Push down Aggregates below joins |