Re: summing tables

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: "Viorel Dragomir" <bc(at)vio(dot)ro>
Cc: "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: summing tables
Date: 2003-07-15 15:38:21
Message-ID: 87u19nls0i.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql


"Viorel Dragomir" <bc(at)vio(dot)ro> writes:

> Anyway, in real life this update modifies only one row with a value wich is
> diff of null. It was really handy if it was specified the option ORDER for
> the update command.

Are you hoping to produce a running total? That's very difficult in standard
SQL. That would be very different from the query you asked for.

Running totals, ranking, lead/lag, are all things that are very difficult to
do in standard SQL. They don't fit in the unordered set model that SQL follows
so doing them without special non-standard functions is very hard and
inefficient.

The functions to do them don't fit well within the SQL universe either, which
might be why they don't exist yet in postgres.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message greg 2003-07-15 15:40:52 Re: Count dates distinct within an interval
Previous Message Viorel Dragomir 2003-07-15 15:32:07 Re: summing tables