Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Date: 2006-02-07 02:27:45
Message-ID: 87u0bbx5r2.fsf@asmodeus.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> TABLE PERSISTENCE [ DROP | TRUNCATE | DEFAULT ]. Tables using
> non-default logging should not use referential integrity with
> default-logging tables.

I have to say this smells way too much like MySQL for me to feel
comfortable. But that's just my opinion. :)

-Doug

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Gigger 2006-02-07 04:07:41 Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-07 02:26:57 Re: drop if exists remainder