From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Steven Flatt" <steven(dot)flatt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bill Moran" <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, "Vivek Khera" <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>, "Pgsql performance" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: When/if to Reindex |
Date: | 2007-08-24 06:49:16 |
Message-ID: | 87tzqp2zrn.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
"Steven Flatt" <steven(dot)flatt(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 8/22/07, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Interestingly enough, the example you've given does not work for me either.
> The select count(*) from test blocks until the reindex completes. Are we
> using the same pg version?
I was using CVS head but given Tom's explanation I wouldn't expect to see any
different behaviour here.
I just retried it and it did block. I can't think of anything I could have
done wrong last time to make it appear not to block. If I had missed an error
at some point along the way I would have expected the reindex to complete
quickly or fail or something but it was definitely just blocked. I remember
noting (much) later that it had finished.
Strange.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anton | 2007-08-24 08:53:05 | partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESC LIMIT 1 |
Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2007-08-24 05:11:31 | Re: When/if to Reindex |