Re: BK-Tree Implementation on top of GiST

From: Volkan Yazıcı <yazicivo(at)ttmail(dot)com>
To: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BK-Tree Implementation on top of GiST
Date: 2008-02-02 13:54:45
Message-ID: 87tzkro44a.fsf@ttmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de> writes:
> http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/1593.html suggests that this uninteresting
> (too much of the database is examined) once you go past an edit distance
> of 1. I don't know if this is a problem in your case (it is in mine).

Did you see the test results in bk-tree[1] project? Results will
change with respect to metric distance distribution of your input
data, but I was quite impressed by the numbers when I first saw them.

[1] http://www.cliki.net/bk-tree

Regards.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Weimer 2008-02-02 16:21:50 Re: configurability of OOM killer
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-02-02 13:41:41 Re: Strange behavior on plpgsql trigger function in if comparison