From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Open Source CRM - Options? |
Date: | 2008-05-28 18:32:41 |
Message-ID: | 87tzgip9di.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> RT has a very different purpose; it was designed to track work (e.g. -
> "work tickets"), as opposed to managing web site content.
>
> It *might* be used as a bug tracker, though with a considerably
> different flavour from (say) Bugzilla; as a CRM, it would be pretty
> unsuitable :-(.
FWIW I think you guys are using CRM to mean something very different from its
usual meaning. A trouble ticket tracking system like RT is pretty much
precisely what is normally referred to as a CRM. What you seem to be referring
to is some subset of CMS, I don't know of any specific name for this kind of
system.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-05-28 18:41:26 | Re: active queries |
Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-05-28 18:30:06 | Re: Bottom Posting |