From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code |
Date: | 2008-09-08 15:16:51 |
Message-ID: | 87tzcq3bx8.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> It's good as a joke, but what if the user says '1024b'? Does it mean
>>> 1024 blocks or one kilobyte? If blocks, what size are we talking, the
>>> usual 512 bytes, or our BLCKSZ?
>
>> For what guc would you find a unit of posix-style "blocks" relevant?!
>
> The point isn't whether it's relevant, the point is that there's a
> fairly serious doubt as to what the user thought it meant.
My point was that we don't accept any form of "b" today and nobody has
suggested we should.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Browne | 2008-09-08 15:20:18 | Fast REVERSE() function? |
Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2008-09-08 15:15:25 | Re: Synchronous Log Shipping Replication |