Re: C++ keywords in headers

From: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: C++ keywords in headers
Date: 2010-12-30 19:27:07
Message-ID: 87tyhvrrhw.fsf@cbbrowne.afilias-int.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net (Peter Eisentraut) writes:

> On mån, 2010-12-27 at 12:33 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On a more general point, it would be useful to have some
>> infrastructure for running quality checks like this and publishing
>> the results. We should be way beyond the point where we rely on
>> individuals doing this sort of stuff.
>
> I had a Hudson service set up for things like this, but the hosting
> was unreliable and then the thing faded away. I could try to revive
> it.

Careful, Oracle has been trying to claim proprietary ownership of
that...
<http://hudson-labs.org/content/whos-driving-thing>
--
``God decided to take the devil to court and settle their differences
once and for all. When Satan heard of this, he grinned and said, "And
just where do you think you're going to find a lawyer?"''

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2010-12-30 21:43:54 Re: The system cannot execute the specified program in windows xp (service pack 3)
Previous Message Chris Browne 2010-12-30 19:18:28 Re: 2 versions of an entity worth distinct table?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-30 19:34:45 Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-12-30 19:04:13 Re: Sync Rep Design