Re: VACUUM degrades performance significantly. Database

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: VACUUM degrades performance significantly. Database
Date: 2003-10-18 04:53:40
Message-ID: 87smlrywmj.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


"Stephen" <jleelim(at)xxxxxx(dot)com> writes:

> ""Dann Corbit"" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> wrote in message
> news:D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B8294CE21E(at)voyager(dot)corporate(dot)connx(dot)com(dot)(dot)(dot)
> > If you are always looking for exact matches, I would suggest
> > experimenting with a hashed index.
>
> I already hashed the 5-way index under the column "id". Removing the 5-way
> index didn't improve responsiveness, but setting elvtune on Linux did! The
> 5-way index is still needed for my purposes.

He meant to use a "hash index" which is a type of index you can create in
postgres. However you should realize that hash indexes have some major bugs in
7.3 and prior. Even in 7.4 with a lot of bugs fixed they still have a lot of
limitations that make them probably not such a hot idea.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Sheets 2003-10-18 05:18:51 Re: Postgres seems to BE on windowsXP
Previous Message Scott Chapman 2003-10-18 04:29:40 How to quote text before inserting into database?