Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: josh(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2
Date: 2004-03-13 21:00:38
Message-ID: 87smgcihs9.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> Please! Reverse Engineering. I can't imagine that anyone got a look at
> Oracle's code.
>
> Hmmm ... I'd always had the impression that MVCC came out of Berkeley.
> Possibly mistaken, I wasn't around.

MVCC is a reasonably well known concurrency control technique -- it is
described in the DBMS literature, etc. It is by no means a PostgreSQL
invention.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-03-13 23:13:08 Re: Comparison of PGSQL and DB2
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-03-12 06:30:56 Re: The big MySQL spin