Tommi Maekitalo <t(dot)maekitalo(at)epgmbh(dot)de> writes:
> Sorting should then be done by top-level-domain first. Then 2nd, 3rd... and
> last by user.
I thought of that but decided not to suggest it:
a) as far as email goes there's no relationship between xxx(at)foo(dot)com and
xxx(at)bar(dot)com(dot) The ".com" doesn't mean the emails are any more related than
xxx(at)foo(dot)com and xxx(at)foo(dot)org are. In fact in practice the latter two are
more likely to be related.
b) it's a lot of extra work, whereas sorting by domain first is just as easy
as sorting by lhs first.
--
greg