From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Oracle tried to buy MySQL |
Date: | 2006-02-16 16:11:33 |
Message-ID: | 87slqjuvuy.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when jzubac(at)internetsecure(dot)com ("John Zubac") would write:
> Isn't this article false in stating that Ingres is tring to build a
> high end open source database package. Isn't postgres based on
> Ingres if I'm correct in my history lesson. And postgres IS a high
> end open source database package.
No, that's not from an accurate history lesson.
Ingres *may* have had some tiny bit of code from University Ingres, in
the beginning, but developed considerably independently.
Postgres *may* have also had some tiny bit of code from University
Ingres, in the beginning, but, again, developed considerably
independently.
It is NOT reasonable to consider Postgres or PostgreSQL to be based on
Ingres. The divergence took place *so* long ago...
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.gultn" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/slony.html
Why do we wash bath towels, aren't we clean when we use them?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2006-02-16 16:29:41 | Re: Why does an ON SELECT rule have to be named "_RETURN"? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-02-16 15:48:41 | Re: A question about Vacuum analyze |