| From: | Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Boreham <david_list(at)boreham(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Date: | 2007-01-03 14:12:21 |
| Message-ID: | 87slesw662.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Stephen Frost:
> Ah, this does sound rather ugly and not something we'd want. The
> particular library doesn't make a whole heck of alot of difference to me
> provided it has the general functionality necessary and a compatible
> license (where 'compatible' in this case really means 'Debian feels it
> is compatible with the GPL').
And several (L)GPL-incompatible licensses. It wouldn't surprise me if
there were a few applications released under licenses which are not
GPL-compatible which also link to libpq.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-01-03 15:16:41 | Re: Added the word TODO in comments |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-01-03 14:12:10 | pg_ctl options |