| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | david(at)kineticode(dot)com ("David E(dot) Wheeler"), tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: latest hstore patch |
| Date: | 2009-09-30 00:00:25 |
| Message-ID: | 87ske5cndy.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "David" == "David E Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> I don't feel particularly strongly about the name (I've also
>> intentionally held off on updating the pgfoundry version of the
>> code until this is settled so no-one else should care either).
David> I'm down with hstore_to_array() and hstore_to_matrix().
>> My own expectation is that the operator should normally be used in
>> preference (though obviously people's tastes will vary in this
>> respect).
David> Sure. But I realized that I forgot to ask for
David> array_to_hstore() and matrix_to_hstore(). :-) Would love to
David> have those, too. Not sure about the operators…
hstore(text[]) (which is also present as an explicit cast) covers both
of those cases since it can figure out from the array dimensions which
is intended.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-09-30 00:32:08 | Re: latest hstore patch |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-09-29 23:45:44 | Re: latest hstore patch |