Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: 2023-06-06 20:37:26
Message-ID: 87sfb4gwgv.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:

> On 6/6/23 15:55, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> Also +1, except that I find "none" a rather confusing choice of name.
>>>> There *is* a provider, it's just PG itself not either libc or ICU.
>>>> I thought Joe's suggestion of "internal" made more sense.
>>
>>> Or perhaps "builtin" or "postgresql".
>> Either OK by me

Joe> Same here

I like either "internal" or "builtin" because they correctly identify
that no external resources are used. I'm not keen on "postgresql".

--
Andrew.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-06-06 21:13:26 Re: Improving FTS for Greek
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-06-06 20:22:30 Re: Assert failure of the cross-check for nullingrels